GSA Home Page

USC Earth Sciences

Clastic Slopes
KENDALL  About Us Images Movies Glossary Reference
USC
USC-GEOL
QUESTIONS
TIME-SCALE
RELATED
GENERAL
FAVORITES
  • Submarine Fans and Seismic Facies
  • Submarine fans form at the continental slope. The basic model used, called the channel-feeding lobe model, and describes fans in three basic parts:

    • a single leveed valley on the upper fan.
    • a mid-fan build up of suprafan depositional lobes at the ends of channels with these lobes switching positions periodically.
    • a topographically smooth lower fan without channels.
    Nomark proposed this basic model in 1978, which used information taken from the Navy Fan, which includes much information taken from side-scan and seismic profiling, as well as core samples. In 1985 Mutti proposed that there are three types of fans rather than three major descriptors of fans. The theoretical types of fans are based on sea-level rise and fall and are as follows: 
    • Type I. Large sandy flows move a way from the channel forming lobes far away from the feeder channel.
    • Type II. Is much like Nomark's model.
    • Type III, muddy channel levees form when, sea level rises.


    Walker and James (1992) say that neither model can be supported by today's findings. 

    To study submarine fans seismic profiling used to observe the seismic facies and from this submarine fans can be described.  The following table helps to summarize these characteristics of seismic facies.

      Nature of Seismic Facies in Various Environments

      Amplitude
      Continuity
      Ext Form
      Int. Configuration
      Lat.distribution
      Channels
      High
      Fair/Low
      Lens
      Sub-parallel
      Narrow/
      Linear
      Levees
      Low/Fair
      Moderate
      Wedge
      Sub-parallel,
      diverging toward channel
      Parallel to channel
      Overbank
      Low/Fair
      Fair
      Sheet
      Sub-parallel
      Widespread away from channel
      Un-chan. Basin Floor
      Low/Moderate
      Fair
      Sheet
      Sub-parallel
      Widespread
      Mass transport complex
      Low
      Poor
      Mounds
      Mounded, hummocky
      Underlies & sub-parallel to channel
      Levee Failure
      Low/Fair
      Fair/Poor
      Wedge
      Mounded, hummocky
      Limited
      Walker and James (1992)
    This table describes four large-scale facies associations, which are: 
    • channel-levee systems.
    • continuous unchannelized sheet-like deposits (overbank or basin plain.
    • mass transport complexes.
    • slumps and debris flows associated with levee failure. 
    Channel-levee systems are characterized by High Amplitude Discontinuous reflectors, that could indicate the interbedding of coarse sands and gravels with muddier horizons (Walker and James 1992).  If these areas are acoustically transparent, there is no acoustic response, then the lithology is probably uniform. This could be channel filling with mud, or sand.

    The channel-filling characterizes a channel that is in disuse where the coarser grained lithology characterizes thalweg channels.

    Levees are defined by LAD and LAC (Low Amplitude Discontinuous and Low Amplitude Continuous) divergent reflectors within wedge-shaped external forms (1992).Walker and James (1992) suggest that amplitudes of reflectors might be higher and become more continuous at levees which suggests a slower deposition . Levees can be as steep as 3.5° at the crest and are prone to slumping. The thickness of channel-levee systems is 150-500 m and width is 30-250 km. 

    Continuous sheet like deposits occur in the lower fan and they also under lie channel-levee systems. They are also found I levees and overbank areas. The reflector tend to be LAC and HAC and represent the deposits of widespread unchannelized turbidity currents. Because sheet-like feature have been found to represent turbidites, by the study of cores, the seismic profiles show that turbidites are laterally extensive and unchannelized.

    Mass transport complexes are probably poorly sorted and stratified. Not much is known of these facies and everything that is known about them is summed up in the above chart. It describes how they look in the seismic profile so they can be identified.

    The slump deposits are described as acoustically transparent and again the information is summed up in the above chart.


    Reference
    Walker, R. G., James, N. P., Facies Models. Geological Association of Canada, 1992

    The Clastic Slope Project
    Last Revised on June 30, 2006