|
Accommodation - Physical
|
|
|
Accommodation is defined by Jervey (1998) as "the space available for potential sediment accumulation". This space is the combined product of movement of:
Jervey (1998) suggested that the major controls on accommodation are changes in relative sea level (i.e. the combined product of eustasy and tectonic movement). Curray, (1964), Posamentier & Allen, (1999), Coe et al (2002), and Catuneanu (2002), among many others, put an emphasis on rates of sedimentation as at least a co-equal control of accommodation. As demonstrated below changes of relative sea level balanced against rates of sediment accumulation lead to accommodation space that is responsible to transgressions and regressions.
Helland-Hansen & Martinsen (1960) consider the processes responsible for the slope of the trajectory taken by these retrogradational, aggradational and progradational parasequences of a shoreline. They suggest that this is controlled by the character of the accommodation and its interaction with the flux of sediment into these marine settings. This flux is reflected in transportion via the shoreline (the maximum wave energy zone) and redistribution in response to the hydrodynamic regime of the basin. Pomar & Kendall (in review) describe how sediments aggrade till waves and currents move them down-shelf, flattening of the depositional profile. These profiles are not only associated with the original accommodation as it relates to the slope but a basinward grain-size decrease that reflects the balance between input, redistribution and accumulation of sediment (Johnson, 1919; Reineck and Singh, 1980; Allen, 1982; Swift et al. 1991b). The resulting "physical" accommodation is modified by this "shelf equilibrium profile" of Swift and Thorne (1991). This profile of Swift and Thorne (1991) represents a conceptual surface of dynamic equilibrium similar to the "marine profile of equilibrium" of Dietz (1963). It is an expression of the notion of wave-base matching the greatest depth to which the bottom is stirred by waves during storms (Rich, 1951). Thus "physical" accommodation comprises the space between sea floor and the "shelf equilibrium profile" of Swift and Thorne (1991), and the unda, clino and fondforms of Rich (1951). In fact the "base level" for sediment accumulation tends to match the "shelf equilibrium profile" and is often confused with sea level. This should be no surprise since base-level datum will be effectively equivalent to sea level when associated with overfed sedimentary systems like deltas. Conversely the "dynamic equilibrium" between sediment input and hydrodynamic power mean that deepening of the shelf equilibrium profile (delta retreat) will result if there is a subsequent decrease in sediment supply. In conclusion eustasy and total sea-floor subsidence, as well as changes in hydrodynamic conditions, govern many of the changes of accommodation space. It should be recognized that unlike the accomodation of siliciclastics described above, the accommodation space for carbonates, is affected by hydrodynamics, but also the capacity of organisms to produce and to accumulate sediments above certain hydrodynamic thresholds. This later effect is the ecological accommodation defined by Pomar (2001 a and b). References |
|
|
home | about site | site contents | site map| submit a site | contact us | top
Copyright
© 2005 University of South
Carolina - Geology Department
All Rights Reserved
|
|